top of page
Search


The “Settled Expectations” Doctrine in PTAB Practice: A Case Study of iRhythm and Dabico
The iRhythm and Dabico decisions demonstrate how PTAB is evolving to prioritize procedural fairness and administrative efficiency by anchoring its discretion in the Settled Expectations doctrine. This development raises the bar for late-stage invalidity petitions and urges petitioners to act strategically and with urgency. Moving forward, this doctrine is likely to stand alongside the Fintiv framework as a decisive tool for discretionary denial.
4 min read
bottom of page
